Audit evidence preparation

Project Description: AI extracts approval, date and other control-test evidence from change tickets and links each finding to its source. It drafts workpapers against agreed criteria; an auditor reviews the evidence and determines the conclusion.

Implementation effort

100–400staff hours total

Current workload

—staff hours / month

Net time saved

—staff hours / month

Project difficulty

Moderate

Implementation work

Define control tests and evidence requirements16–64h
  • Specify the control objective, three test criteria and evidence required to support each criterion.
  • Define exceptions and divide evidence preparation from independent auditor review.
Sources
Prepare ticket evidence and test cases16–64h
  • Connect one change-ticket repository and label 50 historical cases against the agreed criteria.
  • Retain original evidence and check extraction fields, permissions and retention boundaries.
Sources
Configure extraction and draft workpapers24–96h
  • Extract required attributes and apply deterministic checks for the three test criteria.
  • Annotate supporting evidence and produce source-linked draft workpapers for auditor review.
Sources
Validate evidence and control-test results32–128h
  • Have an independent auditor adjudicate held-out cases, including missing or conflicting approvals and dates.
  • Trace workpaper claims to original evidence; correct failures and rerun affected tests.
Sources
Train auditors and pilot the workflow12–48h
  • Train up to five preparers and reviewers; document exception procedures and limits on tool reliance.
  • Run a supervised production pilot and obtain approval for the defined control-test workflow.
Sources

Ongoing work

Maintain evidence preparation32–128h / yr
  • Review extraction quality, evidence formats and regression cases quarterly.
  • Review control criteria, permissions and configuration annually; update tests as evidence or systems change.
Citations
Further projects
  • Add more controls, evidence repositories or ticket types.
  • Extend prepared evidence into recurring control monitoring with auditor review.

Organization assumptions

Organization size

Estimated finance staffing: ≈19 FTE

Workload estimatesAvg. staff hours/month
Changes across projects
How adjustments work
  • Existing systems, data, procedures and skills change the implementation tasks.
  • Workflow automation and exceptions change the current workload and potential time savings.
  • Adjustment sizes are planning assumptions. Case-study results stay unchanged.
  • Shared setup is counted once on the shared foundation project; upkeep remains.
View assumptions and task mappings ↗